1944 Cadillac 62 vs. 2003 Lincoln LS
To start off, 2003 Lincoln LS is newer by 59 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1944 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1944 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,676 cc (8 cylinders), 1944 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1944 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 150 kg more than 2003 Lincoln LS.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1944 Cadillac 62 | 2003 Lincoln LS | |
| Make | Cadillac | Lincoln |
| Model | 62 | LS |
| Year Released | 1944 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5676 cc | 3934 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 276 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1860 kg | 1710 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 3280 mm | 2910 mm |
