1948 Austin A 40 vs. 1982 Toyota Celica
To start off, 1982 Toyota Celica is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1948 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1948 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 2,563 cc, 1982 Toyota Celica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Toyota Celica (119 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 81 more horse power than 1948 Austin A 40. (38 HP @ 4300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1982 Toyota Celica should accelerate faster than 1948 Austin A 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Toyota Celica weights approximately 210 kg more than 1948 Austin A 40. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1982 Toyota Celica (215 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 135 more torque (in Nm) than 1948 Austin A 40. (80 Nm @ 2300 RPM). This means 1982 Toyota Celica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1948 Austin A 40.
Compare all specifications:
1948 Austin A 40 | 1982 Toyota Celica | |
Make | Austin | Toyota |
Model | A 40 | Celica |
Year Released | 1948 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1200 cc | 2563 cc |
Horse Power | 38 HP | 119 HP |
Engine RPM | 4300 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 80 Nm | 215 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2300 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 970 kg | 1180 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3890 mm | 4610 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1620 mm | 1320 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2360 mm | 2640 mm |