1949 Allard J vs. 2003 MCC Smart
To start off, 2003 MCC Smart is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Allard J. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Allard J would be higher. At 4,375 cc (8 cylinders), 1949 Allard J is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1949 Allard J (120 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 39 more horse power than 2003 MCC Smart. (81 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1949 Allard J should accelerate faster than 2003 MCC Smart. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1949 Allard J weights approximately 44 kg more than 2003 MCC Smart. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1949 Allard J | 2003 MCC Smart | |
| Make | Allard | MCC |
| Model | J | Smart |
| Year Released | 1949 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 4375 cc | 698 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 120 HP | 81 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 5250 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 864 kg | 820 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3770 mm | 3440 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 870 mm | 1200 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2370 mm |
