1949 Hudson Commodore vs. 2013 Dodge DART
To start off, 2013 Dodge DART is newer by 64 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Hudson Commodore. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Hudson Commodore would be higher. At 4,166 cc (8 cylinders), 1949 Hudson Commodore is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Dodge DART (158 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 30 more horse power than 1949 Hudson Commodore. (128 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Dodge DART should accelerate faster than 1949 Hudson Commodore. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1949 Hudson Commodore weights approximately 217 kg more than 2013 Dodge DART.
Because 1949 Hudson Commodore is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1949 Hudson Commodore. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Dodge DART, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1949 Hudson Commodore | 2013 Dodge DART | |
| Make | Hudson | Dodge |
| Model | Commodore | DART |
| Year Released | 1949 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4166 cc | 1999 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 128 HP | 158 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 6400 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 76.2 mm | 88 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 114.3 mm | 82 mm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1656 kg | 1439 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5280 mm | 4672 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1960 mm | 1830 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3160 mm | 2703 mm |
