1950 Holden FX vs. 2011 Honda Jazz
To start off, 2011 Honda Jazz is newer by 61 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Holden FX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Holden FX would be higher. At 2,165 cc (6 cylinders), 1950 Holden FX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Honda Jazz (118 HP) has 67 more horse power than 1950 Holden FX. (51 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Honda Jazz should accelerate faster than 1950 Holden FX.
Because 1950 Holden FX is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1950 Holden FX. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Honda Jazz, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Honda Jazz (145 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 9 more torque (in Nm) than 1950 Holden FX. (136 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2011 Honda Jazz will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1950 Holden FX.
Compare all specifications:
1950 Holden FX | 2011 Honda Jazz | |
Make | Holden | Honda |
Model | FX | Jazz |
Year Released | 1950 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2165 cc | 1497 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 51 HP | 118 HP |
Torque | 136 Nm | 145 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4380 mm | 3910 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1530 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1700 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2510 mm |