1951 Austin A 40 vs. 2010 Renault Fluence
To start off, 2010 Renault Fluence is newer by 59 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 1,500 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Renault Fluence is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Renault Fluence (110 HP) has 72 more horse power than 1951 Austin A 40. (38 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Renault Fluence should accelerate faster than 1951 Austin A 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Renault Fluence weights approximately 255 kg more than 1951 Austin A 40. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1951 Austin A 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1951 Austin A 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Renault Fluence, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1951 Austin A 40 | 2010 Renault Fluence | |
Make | Austin | Renault |
Model | A 40 | Fluence |
Year Released | 1951 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1200 cc | 1500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 38 HP | 110 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 970 kg | 1225 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3890 mm | 4618 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1809 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1620 mm | 1478 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2360 mm | 2702 mm |