1951 Buick LeSabre vs. 1942 Cadillac 60
To start off, 1951 Buick LeSabre is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1942 Cadillac 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1942 Cadillac 60 would be higher. At 5,671 cc (8 cylinders), 1942 Cadillac 60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1951 Buick LeSabre (335 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 187 more horse power than 1942 Cadillac 60. (148 HP @ 3400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1951 Buick LeSabre should accelerate faster than 1942 Cadillac 60. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1942 Cadillac 60 weights approximately 97 kg more than 1951 Buick LeSabre.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1951 Buick LeSabre has automatic transmission and 1942 Cadillac 60 has manual transmission. 1942 Cadillac 60 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1951 Buick LeSabre will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1951 Buick LeSabre | 1942 Cadillac 60 | |
Make | Buick | Cadillac |
Model | LeSabre | 60 |
Year Released | 1951 | 1942 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3523 cc | 5671 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 335 HP | 148 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 3400 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1723 kg | 1820 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5130 mm | 5450 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1920 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2930 mm | 3230 mm |