1951 Humber Pullman vs. 2006 Mazda 6
To start off, 2006 Mazda 6 is newer by 55 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Humber Pullman. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Humber Pullman would be higher. At 4,085 cc (6 cylinders), 1951 Humber Pullman is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mazda 6 (160 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 60 more horse power than 1951 Humber Pullman. (100 HP @ 3400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1951 Humber Pullman. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1951 Humber Pullman weights approximately 646 kg more than 2006 Mazda 6.
Because 1951 Humber Pullman is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1951 Humber Pullman. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1951 Humber Pullman | 2006 Mazda 6 | |
| Make | Humber | Mazda |
| Model | Pullman | 6 |
| Year Released | 1951 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4085 cc | 2262 cc |
| Horse Power | 100 HP | 160 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3400 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 8 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2032 kg | 1386 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 4750 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1790 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3330 mm | 2680 mm |
