1952 Jeep CJ3A vs. 2011 Fisker Karma
To start off, 2011 Fisker Karma is newer by 59 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Jeep CJ3A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Jeep CJ3A would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Fisker Karma weights approximately 1430 kg more than 1952 Jeep CJ3A.
Because 1952 Jeep CJ3A is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2011 Fisker Karma. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1952 Jeep CJ3A will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Jeep CJ3A | 2011 Fisker Karma | |
| Make | Jeep | Fisker |
| Model | CJ3A | Karma |
| Year Released | 1952 | 2011 |
| Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Single Speed |
| Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 2540 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3130 mm | 4996 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1460 mm | 1984 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1630 mm | 1331 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 3160 mm |
