1953 AC 2-Litre vs. 2009 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2009 Ford Ecosport is newer by 56 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 AC 2-Litre. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 AC 2-Litre would be higher. At 1,991 cc (6 cylinders), 1953 AC 2-Litre is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1953 AC 2-Litre (76 HP) has 9 more horse power than 2009 Ford Ecosport. (67 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1953 AC 2-Litre should accelerate faster than 2009 Ford Ecosport.
Because 1953 AC 2-Litre is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1953 AC 2-Litre. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Ford Ecosport, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1953 AC 2-Litre | 2009 Ford Ecosport | |
Make | AC | Ford |
Model | 2-Litre | Ecosport |
Year Released | 1953 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1991 cc | 1400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 76 HP | 67 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4680 mm | 4228 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1980 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1679 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2980 mm | 2490 mm |