1955 Abarth 210 vs. 2008 Peugeot 206
To start off, 2008 Peugeot 206 is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Abarth 210. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Abarth 210 would be higher. At 1,995 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 Peugeot 206 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Peugeot 206 weights approximately 690 kg more than 1955 Abarth 210.
Because 1955 Abarth 210 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1955 Abarth 210. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Peugeot 206, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1955 Abarth 210 | 2008 Peugeot 206 | |
Make | Abarth | Peugeot |
Model | 210 | 206 |
Year Released | 1955 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 633 cc | 1995 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 33 HP | 0 HP |
Engine Bore Size | 60 mm | 85 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 56 mm | 88 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 10.8:1 |
Top Speed | 140 km/hour | 220 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 410 kg | 1100 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3680 mm | 3840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 940 mm | 1480 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 1960 mm | 2450 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 27 L | 50 L |