1955 Alfa Romeo 1900 vs. 2000 Chevrolet Astro
To start off, 2000 Chevrolet Astro is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Alfa Romeo 1900. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Alfa Romeo 1900 would be higher. At 4,300 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Chevrolet Astro is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Chevrolet Astro weights approximately 237 kg more than 1955 Alfa Romeo 1900.
Because 2000 Chevrolet Astro is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1955 Alfa Romeo 1900. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Chevrolet Astro will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2000 Chevrolet Astro has automatic transmission and 1955 Alfa Romeo 1900 has manual transmission. 1955 Alfa Romeo 1900 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Chevrolet Astro will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1955 Alfa Romeo 1900 | 2000 Chevrolet Astro | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Chevrolet |
Model | 1900 | Astro |
Year Released | 1955 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1974 cc | 4300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 114 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 8 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 950 kg | 1187 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4410 mm | 4830 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1980 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1940 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2790 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 71 L | 64 L |