1955 Buick 40 vs. 2000 Dodge Neon
To start off, 2000 Dodge Neon is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Buick 40 would be higher. At 5,277 cc (8 cylinders), 1955 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1955 Buick 40 (234 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 175 more horse power than 2000 Dodge Neon. (59 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1955 Buick 40 should accelerate faster than 2000 Dodge Neon.
Because 1955 Buick 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1955 Buick 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Dodge Neon, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1955 Buick 40 (447 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 287 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Dodge Neon. (160 Nm @ 1500 RPM). This means 1955 Buick 40 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Dodge Neon.
Compare all specifications:
1955 Buick 40 | 2000 Dodge Neon | |
Make | Buick | Dodge |
Model | 40 | Neon |
Year Released | 1955 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5277 cc | 1687 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 234 HP | 59 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Torque | 447 Nm | 160 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 1500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Wheelbase Size | 3110 mm | 2650 mm |