1955 Ford Fairlane vs. 1967 Triumph Herald
To start off, 1967 Triumph Herald is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Ford Fairlane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Ford Fairlane would be higher. At 4,785 cc (8 cylinders), 1955 Ford Fairlane is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1955 Ford Fairlane weights approximately 682 kg more than 1967 Triumph Herald.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1955 Ford Fairlane | 1967 Triumph Herald | |
| Make | Ford | Triumph |
| Model | Fairlane | Herald |
| Year Released | 1955 | 1967 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4785 cc | 1296 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 60 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1520 kg | 838 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 3000 mm | 2330 mm |
