1956 Austin-Healey Sports Convertible vs. 1972 Ford GT 40
To start off, 1972 Ford GT 40 is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Austin-Healey Sports Convertible. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Austin-Healey Sports Convertible would be higher. At 4,195 cc (8 cylinders), 1972 Ford GT 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Ford GT 40 (350 HP @ 7200 RPM) has 245 more horse power than 1956 Austin-Healey Sports Convertible. (105 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1972 Ford GT 40 should accelerate faster than 1956 Austin-Healey Sports Convertible. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1956 Austin-Healey Sports Convertible weights approximately 490 kg more than 1972 Ford GT 40.
Let's talk about torque, 1956 Austin-Healey Sports Convertible (190 Nm) has 105 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Ford GT 40. (85 Nm). This means 1956 Austin-Healey Sports Convertible will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Ford GT 40.
Compare all specifications:
| 1956 Austin-Healey Sports Convertible | 1972 Ford GT 40 | |
| Make | Austin-Healey | Ford |
| Model | Sports Convertible | GT 40 |
| Year Released | 1956 | 1972 |
| Body Type | Convertible | Coupe |
| Engine Size | 2993 cc | 4195 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 105 HP | 350 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 7200 RPM |
| Torque | 190 Nm | 85 Nm |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1450 kg | 960 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 4350 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1800 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 980 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2420 mm |
