1957 AC Aceca vs. 2005 Mercedes-Benz ML
To start off, 2005 Mercedes-Benz ML is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1957 AC Aceca. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1957 AC Aceca would be higher. At 5,439 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Mercedes-Benz ML is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Mercedes-Benz ML (286 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 212 more horse power than 1957 AC Aceca. (74 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Mercedes-Benz ML should accelerate faster than 1957 AC Aceca. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Mercedes-Benz ML weights approximately 1410 kg more than 1957 AC Aceca. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 Mercedes-Benz ML is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1957 AC Aceca. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Mercedes-Benz ML will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1957 AC Aceca | 2005 Mercedes-Benz ML | |
Make | AC | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | Aceca | ML |
Year Released | 1957 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1991 cc | 5439 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 286 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 890 kg | 2300 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2720 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 93 L |