1958 AC Ace vs. 2013 Toyota Highlander
To start off, 2013 Toyota Highlander is newer by 55 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 AC Ace. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 AC Ace would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Toyota Highlander is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Toyota Highlander (266 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 141 more horse power than 1958 AC Ace. (125 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Toyota Highlander should accelerate faster than 1958 AC Ace. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Toyota Highlander weights approximately 851 kg more than 1958 AC Ace. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2013 Toyota Highlander (252 Nm @ 4100 RPM) has 85 more torque (in Nm) than 1958 AC Ace. (167 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2013 Toyota Highlander will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1958 AC Ace.
Compare all specifications:
1958 AC Ace | 2013 Toyota Highlander | |
Make | AC | Toyota |
Model | Ace | Highlander |
Year Released | 1958 | 2013 |
Body Type | Roadster | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 3500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 125 HP | 266 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Torque | 167 Nm | 252 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 4100 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 66 mm | 90 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 96 mm | 105 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 894 kg | 1745 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4010 mm | 4785 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1520 mm | 1910 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1270 mm | 1760 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2790 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 73 L |