1958 AC Aceca vs. 2005 Nissan Bluebird
To start off, 2005 Nissan Bluebird is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 AC Aceca. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 AC Aceca would be higher. At 1,991 cc (6 cylinders), 1958 AC Aceca is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Nissan Bluebird weights approximately 280 kg more than 1958 AC Aceca.
Because 2005 Nissan Bluebird is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1958 AC Aceca. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Nissan Bluebird will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1958 AC Aceca | 2005 Nissan Bluebird | |
| Make | AC | Nissan |
| Model | Aceca | Bluebird |
| Year Released | 1958 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1991 cc | 1500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 74 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 890 kg | 1170 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4480 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1450 mm |
