1958 Bristol 405 vs. 1968 Nissan Cedric
To start off, 1968 Nissan Cedric is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Bristol 405. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Bristol 405 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 1968 Nissan Cedric is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Nissan Cedric (114 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 14 more horse power than 1958 Bristol 405. (100 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1968 Nissan Cedric should accelerate faster than 1958 Bristol 405. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Nissan Cedric weights approximately 48 kg more than 1958 Bristol 405. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1968 Nissan Cedric (165 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 13 more torque (in Nm) than 1958 Bristol 405. (152 Nm @ 3750 RPM). This means 1968 Nissan Cedric will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1958 Bristol 405.
Compare all specifications:
1958 Bristol 405 | 1968 Nissan Cedric | |
Make | Bristol | Nissan |
Model | 405 | Cedric |
Year Released | 1958 | 1968 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 114 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 152 Nm | 165 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3750 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1242 kg | 1290 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4820 mm | 4700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 2700 mm |