1958 Chevrolet Impala vs. 1997 Mercedes-Benz SL
To start off, 1997 Mercedes-Benz SL is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Chevrolet Impala. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Chevrolet Impala would be higher. At 3,851 cc (6 cylinders), 1958 Chevrolet Impala is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Mercedes-Benz SL weights approximately 120 kg more than 1958 Chevrolet Impala.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1958 Chevrolet Impala | 1997 Mercedes-Benz SL | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Mercedes-Benz |
| Model | Impala | SL |
| Year Released | 1958 | 1997 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3851 cc | 2799 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 190 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1640 kg | 1760 kg |
| Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1820 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3030 mm | 2520 mm |
