1958 Lotus 16 vs. 2006 Volvo S40
To start off, 2006 Volvo S40 is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Lotus 16. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Lotus 16 would be higher. At 2,521 cc (5 cylinders), 2006 Volvo S40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1958 Lotus 16 (238 HP @ 6750 RPM) has 21 more horse power than 2006 Volvo S40. (217 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1958 Lotus 16 should accelerate faster than 2006 Volvo S40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Volvo S40 weights approximately 908 kg more than 1958 Lotus 16.
Because 1958 Lotus 16 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1958 Lotus 16. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Volvo S40, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2006 Volvo S40 has automatic transmission and 1958 Lotus 16 has manual transmission. 1958 Lotus 16 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2006 Volvo S40 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1958 Lotus 16 | 2006 Volvo S40 | |
| Make | Lotus | Volvo |
| Model | 16 | S40 |
| Year Released | 1958 | 2006 |
| Engine Size | 2500 cc | 2521 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 238 HP | 217 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6750 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 550 kg | 1458 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3510 mm | 4470 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2650 mm |
