1959 Austin A 55 vs. 2004 Buick Regal
To start off, 2004 Buick Regal is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Austin A 55. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Austin A 55 would be higher. At 3,791 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Buick Regal is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Buick Regal (197 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 143 more horse power than 1959 Austin A 55. (54 HP @ 4350 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Buick Regal should accelerate faster than 1959 Austin A 55. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Buick Regal weights approximately 401 kg more than 1959 Austin A 55. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1959 Austin A 55 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1959 Austin A 55. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Buick Regal, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Buick Regal (312 Nm) has 244 more torque (in Nm) than 1959 Austin A 55. (68 Nm). This means 2004 Buick Regal will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1959 Austin A 55.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Austin A 55 | 2004 Buick Regal | |
Make | Austin | Buick |
Model | A 55 | Regal |
Year Released | 1959 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1489 cc | 3791 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 54 HP | 197 HP |
Engine RPM | 4350 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 68 Nm | 312 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 73 mm | 97 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88.9 mm | 86 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.3:1 | 9.4:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1120 kg | 1521 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 4990 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1850 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 3080 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 66 L |