1959 Berkeley QB vs. 1981 Volvo 240
To start off, 1981 Volvo 240 is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Berkeley QB. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Berkeley QB would be higher. At 2,383 cc (6 cylinders), 1981 Volvo 240 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1981 Volvo 240 (81 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 42 more horse power than 1959 Berkeley QB. (39 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1981 Volvo 240 should accelerate faster than 1959 Berkeley QB. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1981 Volvo 240 weights approximately 989 kg more than 1959 Berkeley QB. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1981 Volvo 240 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1981 Volvo 240. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1959 Berkeley QB, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1981 Volvo 240 (140 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 82 more torque (in Nm) than 1959 Berkeley QB. (58 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1981 Volvo 240 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1959 Berkeley QB.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Berkeley QB | 1981 Volvo 240 | |
Make | Berkeley | Volvo |
Model | QB | 240 |
Year Released | 1959 | 1981 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 691 cc | 2383 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 39 HP | 81 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 58 Nm | 140 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 70 mm | 76.6 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 90 mm | 86.4 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 7.5:1 | 23.5:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 381 kg | 1370 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3400 mm | 4790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1380 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1170 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 1990 mm | 2660 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 25 L | 60 L |