1959 Cadillac 62 vs. 2003 MCC Smart
To start off, 2003 MCC Smart is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,381 cc (8 cylinders), 1959 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1959 Cadillac 62 (325 HP) has 219 more horse power than 2003 MCC Smart. (106 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1959 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 2003 MCC Smart. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 1243 kg more than 2003 MCC Smart. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1959 Cadillac 62 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1959 Cadillac 62. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 MCC Smart, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1959 Cadillac 62 (583 Nm) has 438 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 MCC Smart. (145 Nm). This means 1959 Cadillac 62 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 MCC Smart.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Cadillac 62 | 2003 MCC Smart | |
Make | Cadillac | MCC |
Model | 62 | Smart |
Year Released | 1959 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6381 cc | 1499 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 325 HP | 106 HP |
Torque | 583 Nm | 145 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 101.6 mm | 75 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 98.4 mm | 84.8 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 10.5:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2218 kg | 975 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5720 mm | 3760 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2510 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 47 L |