1959 Ford 17M vs. 2003 Subaru R2
To start off, 2003 Subaru R2 is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Ford 17M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Ford 17M would be higher. At 1,697 cc (4 cylinders), 1959 Ford 17M is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1959 Ford 17M (59 HP @ 4250 RPM) has 15 more horse power than 2003 Subaru R2. (44 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1959 Ford 17M should accelerate faster than 2003 Subaru R2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Ford 17M weights approximately 345 kg more than 2003 Subaru R2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1959 Ford 17M is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1959 Ford 17M. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Subaru R2, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1959 Ford 17M (120 Nm @ 2200 RPM) has 62 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Subaru R2. (58 Nm @ 5200 RPM). This means 1959 Ford 17M will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Subaru R2.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Ford 17M | 2003 Subaru R2 | |
Make | Ford | Subaru |
Model | 17M | R2 |
Year Released | 1959 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1697 cc | 657 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 44 HP |
Engine RPM | 4250 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 120 Nm | 58 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 84 mm | 56 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 76.6 mm | 66.8 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 7.1:1 | 10.5:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1115 kg | 770 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4380 mm | 3400 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1480 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2370 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 30 L |