1959 Ford Fairlane vs. 2000 Honda Passport
To start off, 2000 Honda Passport is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Ford Fairlane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Ford Fairlane would be higher. At 5,769 cc (8 cylinders), 1959 Ford Fairlane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Honda Passport (190 HP) has 22 more horse power than 1959 Ford Fairlane. (168 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Honda Passport should accelerate faster than 1959 Ford Fairlane.
Because 1959 Ford Fairlane is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1959 Ford Fairlane. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Honda Passport, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1959 Ford Fairlane | 2000 Honda Passport | |
| Make | Ford | Honda |
| Model | Fairlane | Passport |
| Year Released | 1959 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5769 cc | 3201 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 168 HP | 190 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Vehicle Length | 5260 mm | 4510 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3000 mm | 2710 mm |
