1960 AC Greyhound vs. 2004 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2004 Ford Ranger is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 AC Greyhound. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 AC Greyhound would be higher. At 4,015 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford Ranger (207 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 84 more horse power than 1960 AC Greyhound. (123 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1960 AC Greyhound. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford Ranger weights approximately 193 kg more than 1960 AC Greyhound. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
1960 AC Greyhound | 2004 Ford Ranger | |
Make | AC | Ford |
Model | Greyhound | Ranger |
Year Released | 1960 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 4015 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 207 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1015 kg | 1208 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 5130 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1730 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 3200 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 74 L |