1960 Austin 7 vs. 2004 BMW M3
To start off, 2004 BMW M3 is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Austin 7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Austin 7 would be higher. At 3,246 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 BMW M3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 BMW M3 (328 HP @ 7400 RPM) has 295 more horse power than 1960 Austin 7. (33 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 1960 Austin 7. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 BMW M3 weights approximately 939 kg more than 1960 Austin 7. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 BMW M3 (350 Nm) has 290 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 Austin 7. (60 Nm). This means 2004 BMW M3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 Austin 7.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Austin 7 | 2004 BMW M3 | |
Make | Austin | BMW |
Model | 7 | M3 |
Year Released | 1960 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 848 cc | 3246 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 33 HP | 328 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 7400 RPM |
Torque | 60 Nm | 350 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 62.9 mm | 87 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 68.3 mm | 91 mm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 610 kg | 1549 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3060 mm | 4500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2730 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 26 L | 63 L |