1960 Cadillac 62 vs. 1978 Mitsubishi Jeep
To start off, 1978 Mitsubishi Jeep is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1960 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1960 Cadillac 62 (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 95 more horse power than 1978 Mitsubishi Jeep. (102 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1960 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1978 Mitsubishi Jeep. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1960 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 671 kg more than 1978 Mitsubishi Jeep. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1978 Mitsubishi Jeep is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1960 Cadillac 62. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1978 Mitsubishi Jeep will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Cadillac 62 | 1978 Mitsubishi Jeep | |
Make | Cadillac | Mitsubishi |
Model | 62 | Jeep |
Year Released | 1960 | 1978 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6390 cc | 2384 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 102 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 2195 kg | 1524 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5730 mm | 4300 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1900 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2650 mm |