1960 Ferrari 256 F1 vs. 2013 Volvo XC90
To start off, 2013 Volvo XC90 is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Ferrari 256 F1. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Ferrari 256 F1 would be higher. At 3,200 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Volvo XC90 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1960 Ferrari 256 F1 (292 HP @ 8600 RPM) has 55 more horse power than 2013 Volvo XC90. (237 HP @ 6400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1960 Ferrari 256 F1 should accelerate faster than 2013 Volvo XC90. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Volvo XC90 weights approximately 1600 kg more than 1960 Ferrari 256 F1.
Because 1960 Ferrari 256 F1 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 Ferrari 256 F1. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Volvo XC90, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Ferrari 256 F1 | 2013 Volvo XC90 | |
Make | Ferrari | Volvo |
Model | 256 F1 | XC90 |
Year Released | 1960 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2474 cc | 3200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 6 valves |
Horse Power | 292 HP | 237 HP |
Engine RPM | 8600 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 560 kg | 2160 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4040 mm | 4807 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1510 mm | 1936 mm |
Vehicle Height | 990 mm | 1784 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2230 mm | 2857 mm |