1960 Ford Falcon vs. 2004 Toyota Tundra
To start off, 2004 Toyota Tundra is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Ford Falcon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Ford Falcon would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Toyota Tundra weights approximately 660 kg more than 1960 Ford Falcon.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1960 Ford Falcon | 2004 Toyota Tundra | |
| Make | Ford | Toyota |
| Model | Falcon | Tundra |
| Year Released | 1960 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 190 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1120 kg | 1780 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4610 mm | 5530 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1920 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1800 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 3270 mm |
