1960 Nissan Cedric vs. 2013 Mazda 3
To start off, 2013 Mazda 3 is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 1,999 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Mazda 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Mazda 3 (146 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 86 more horse power than 1960 Nissan Cedric. (60 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 1960 Nissan Cedric.
Let's talk about torque, 2013 Mazda 3 (200 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 84 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 Nissan Cedric. (116 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2013 Mazda 3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
| 1960 Nissan Cedric | 2013 Mazda 3 | |
| Make | Nissan | Mazda |
| Model | Cedric | 3 |
| Year Released | 1960 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1488 cc | 1999 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 60 HP | 146 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Torque | 116 Nm | 200 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Length | 4420 mm | 4595 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1755 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1470 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2640 mm |
