1961 Abarth 2200 vs. 1966 ZAZ 966
To start off, 1966 ZAZ 966 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Abarth 2200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Abarth 2200 would be higher. At 2,160 cc (6 cylinders), 1961 Abarth 2200 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1961 Abarth 2200 (133 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 106 more horse power than 1966 ZAZ 966. (27 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1961 Abarth 2200 should accelerate faster than 1966 ZAZ 966. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1961 Abarth 2200 weights approximately 356 kg more than 1966 ZAZ 966. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1961 Abarth 2200 | 1966 ZAZ 966 | |
| Make | Abarth | ZAZ |
| Model | 2200 | 966 |
| Year Released | 1961 | 1966 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 2160 cc | 887 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 133 HP | 27 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1100 kg | 744 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4590 mm | 3740 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1540 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1380 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2170 mm |
