1961 AC Cobra vs. 1993 Renault Clio
To start off, 1993 Renault Clio is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 AC Cobra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 AC Cobra would be higher. At 4,265 cc (8 cylinders), 1961 AC Cobra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1961 AC Cobra (256 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 108 more horse power than 1993 Renault Clio. (148 HP @ 6100 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1961 AC Cobra should accelerate faster than 1993 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1993 Renault Clio weights approximately 20 kg more than 1961 AC Cobra.
Let's talk about torque, 1961 AC Cobra (365 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 183 more torque (in Nm) than 1993 Renault Clio. (182 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 1961 AC Cobra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1993 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
1961 AC Cobra | 1993 Renault Clio | |
Make | AC | Renault |
Model | Cobra | Clio |
Year Released | 1961 | 1993 |
Body Type | Roadster | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4265 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 256 HP | 148 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 6100 RPM |
Torque | 365 Nm | 182 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4800 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 10.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 980 kg | 1000 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3850 mm | 3710 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1400 mm |