1961 Cadillac 62 vs. 2009 Nissan 350Z
To start off, 2009 Nissan 350Z is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,389 cc (8 cylinders), 1961 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Nissan 350Z (309 HP @ 6800 RPM) has 112 more horse power than 1961 Cadillac 62. (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Nissan 350Z should accelerate faster than 1961 Cadillac 62.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1961 Cadillac 62 | 2009 Nissan 350Z | |
Make | Cadillac | Nissan |
Model | 62 | 350Z |
Year Released | 1961 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6389 cc | 3498 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 309 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6800 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 101.6 mm | 95.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 98.4 mm | 81.4 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5650 mm | 4320 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1340 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1820 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2660 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 80 L |