1962 AC Aceca vs. 2003 Ford Taurus
To start off, 2003 Ford Taurus is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 AC Aceca. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 AC Aceca would be higher. At 2,967 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Ford Taurus is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Ford Taurus (155 HP @ 4900 RPM) has 30 more horse power than 1962 AC Aceca. (125 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Ford Taurus should accelerate faster than 1962 AC Aceca. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Ford Taurus weights approximately 583 kg more than 1962 AC Aceca. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1962 AC Aceca is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 AC Aceca. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Ford Taurus, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Ford Taurus (244 Nm @ 3950 RPM) has 77 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 AC Aceca. (167 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2003 Ford Taurus will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 AC Aceca.
Compare all specifications:
1962 AC Aceca | 2003 Ford Taurus | |
Make | AC | Ford |
Model | Aceca | Taurus |
Year Released | 1962 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 2967 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 125 HP | 155 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4900 RPM |
Torque | 167 Nm | 244 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 3950 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 9.3:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 894 kg | 1477 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 5030 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1860 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 3030 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 68 L |