1962 AC Aceca vs. 2008 Nissan Livina
To start off, 2008 Nissan Livina is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 AC Aceca. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 AC Aceca would be higher. At 2,553 cc (6 cylinders), 1962 AC Aceca is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Nissan Livina weights approximately 286 kg more than 1962 AC Aceca.
Because 2008 Nissan Livina is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1962 AC Aceca. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Nissan Livina will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1962 AC Aceca (209 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 56 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Nissan Livina. (153 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 1962 AC Aceca will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Nissan Livina.
Compare all specifications:
1962 AC Aceca | 2008 Nissan Livina | |
Make | AC | Nissan |
Model | Aceca | Livina |
Year Released | 1962 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2553 cc | 1598 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 168 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 209 Nm | 153 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 791 kg | 1077 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 5260 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1670 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2610 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 52 L |