1962 AC Cobra vs. 1963 Triumph Herald
To start off, 1963 Triumph Herald is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 AC Cobra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 AC Cobra would be higher. At 4,265 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 AC Cobra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 AC Cobra (256 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 218 more horse power than 1963 Triumph Herald. (38 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1962 AC Cobra should accelerate faster than 1963 Triumph Herald. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 AC Cobra weights approximately 204 kg more than 1963 Triumph Herald. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1962 AC Cobra (365 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 282 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Triumph Herald. (83 Nm @ 2250 RPM). This means 1962 AC Cobra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Triumph Herald.
Compare all specifications:
1962 AC Cobra | 1963 Triumph Herald | |
Make | AC | Triumph |
Model | Cobra | Herald |
Year Released | 1962 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4265 cc | 1147 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 256 HP | 38 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque | 365 Nm | 83 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4800 RPM | 2250 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 96.5 mm | 69.3 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 72.9 mm | 76 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 9.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 984 kg | 780 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3850 mm | 3890 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1530 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2320 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 29 L |