1962 Alfa Romeo Giulia vs. 2013 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2013 Cadillac CTS is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Alfa Romeo Giulia. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Alfa Romeo Giulia would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Cadillac CTS (314 HP) has 199 more horse power than 1962 Alfa Romeo Giulia. (115 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1962 Alfa Romeo Giulia. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 903 kg more than 1962 Alfa Romeo Giulia. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2013 Cadillac CTS (373 Nm @ 4900 RPM) has 228 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Alfa Romeo Giulia. (145 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 2013 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Alfa Romeo Giulia.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Alfa Romeo Giulia | 2013 Cadillac CTS | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Cadillac |
Model | Giulia | CTS |
Year Released | 1962 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1568 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 115 HP | 314 HP |
Torque | 145 Nm | 373 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 4900 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 78 mm | 94 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 82 mm | 86 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1050 kg | 1953 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4150 mm | 4877 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1842 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1473 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2880 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 46 L | 68 L |