1962 Cadillac 62 vs. 2001 GAZ 3110
To start off, 2001 GAZ 3110 is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,388 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Cadillac 62 (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 63 more horse power than 2001 GAZ 3110. (134 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1962 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 2001 GAZ 3110. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 655 kg more than 2001 GAZ 3110. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1962 Cadillac 62 (582 Nm) has 393 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 GAZ 3110. (189 Nm). This means 1962 Cadillac 62 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 GAZ 3110.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Cadillac 62 | 2001 GAZ 3110 | |
Make | Cadillac | GAZ |
Model | 62 | 3110 |
Year Released | 1962 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6388 cc | 1995 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 134 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 582 Nm | 189 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 2055 kg | 1400 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5650 mm | 4880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1490 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2810 mm |