1962 Cadillac Biarritz vs. 2005 Mercedes-Benz ML
To start off, 2005 Mercedes-Benz ML is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Cadillac Biarritz. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Cadillac Biarritz would be higher. At 6,388 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Cadillac Biarritz is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Mercedes-Benz ML (231 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 34 more horse power than 1962 Cadillac Biarritz. (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Mercedes-Benz ML should accelerate faster than 1962 Cadillac Biarritz. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Cadillac Biarritz weights approximately 60 kg more than 2005 Mercedes-Benz ML.
Because 2005 Mercedes-Benz ML is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1962 Cadillac Biarritz. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Mercedes-Benz ML will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1962 Cadillac Biarritz (582 Nm) has 252 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Mercedes-Benz ML. (330 Nm). This means 1962 Cadillac Biarritz will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Mercedes-Benz ML.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Cadillac Biarritz | 2005 Mercedes-Benz ML | |
| Make | Cadillac | Mercedes-Benz |
| Model | Biarritz | ML |
| Year Released | 1962 | 2005 |
| Body Type | Convertible | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6388 cc | 3724 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 231 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Torque | 582 Nm | 330 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 2180 kg | 2120 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2720 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 83 L |
