1963 Austin Princess vs. 1992 Toyota Lite Ace
To start off, 1992 Toyota Lite Ace is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Austin Princess. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Austin Princess would be higher. At 3,992 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 Austin Princess is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Austin Princess weights approximately 1080 kg more than 1992 Toyota Lite Ace.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Austin Princess | 1992 Toyota Lite Ace | |
| Make | Austin | Toyota |
| Model | Princess | Lite Ace |
| Year Released | 1963 | 1992 |
| Engine Size | 3992 cc | 1453 cc |
| Horse Power | 118 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 2180 kg | 1100 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5470 mm | 4010 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1780 mm | 1910 mm |
