1963 Cadillac 62 vs. 2006 Volvo V50
To start off, 2006 Volvo V50 is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Volvo V50 (217 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 20 more horse power than 1963 Cadillac 62. (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Volvo V50 should accelerate faster than 1963 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 611 kg more than 2006 Volvo V50.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Cadillac 62 | 2006 Volvo V50 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Volvo |
| Model | 62 | V50 |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6390 cc | 2521 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 217 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 101.6 mm | 83 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 98.4 mm | 93.2 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2090 kg | 1479 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5680 mm | 4520 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1780 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1460 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2650 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 62 L |
