1963 Lotus Seven vs. 2000 Opel Omega
To start off, 2000 Opel Omega is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Lotus Seven. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Lotus Seven would be higher. At 5,666 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Opel Omega is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Opel Omega (305 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 267 more horse power than 1963 Lotus Seven. (38 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Opel Omega should accelerate faster than 1963 Lotus Seven. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Opel Omega weights approximately 880 kg more than 1963 Lotus Seven. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Lotus Seven | 2000 Opel Omega | |
| Make | Lotus | Opel |
| Model | Seven | Omega |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 997 cc | 5666 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 38 HP | 305 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 430 kg | 1310 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2240 mm | 2620 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 29 L | 52 L |
