1964 Abarth 1300 vs. 1965 Riley Kestrel
To start off, 1965 Riley Kestrel is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Abarth 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Abarth 1300 would be higher. At 1,280 cc (4 cylinders), 1964 Abarth 1300 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Abarth 1300 (137 HP @ 7600 RPM) has 84 more horse power than 1965 Riley Kestrel. (53 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Abarth 1300 should accelerate faster than 1965 Riley Kestrel. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Riley Kestrel weights approximately 255 kg more than 1964 Abarth 1300.
Because 1964 Abarth 1300 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Abarth 1300. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1965 Riley Kestrel, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Abarth 1300 | 1965 Riley Kestrel | |
Make | Abarth | Riley |
Model | 1300 | Kestrel |
Year Released | 1964 | 1965 |
Engine Size | 1280 cc | 1098 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 137 HP | 53 HP |
Engine RPM | 7600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 630 kg | 885 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3560 mm | 3730 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1540 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2100 mm | 2380 mm |