1964 Austin A 110 vs. 2004 Ford Mustang

To start off, 2004 Ford Mustang is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Austin A 110. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Austin A 110 would be higher. At 4,605 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford Mustang (305 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 185 more horse power than 1964 Austin A 110. (120 HP @ 4750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1964 Austin A 110. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Austin A 110 weights approximately 30 kg more than 2004 Ford Mustang.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford Mustang (434 Nm) has 212 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Austin A 110. (222 Nm). This means 2004 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Austin A 110.

Compare all specifications:

1964 Austin A 110 2004 Ford Mustang
Make Austin Ford
Model A 110 Mustang
Year Released 1964 2004
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2912 cc 4605 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 120 HP 305 HP
Engine RPM 4750 RPM 6000 RPM
Torque 222 Nm 434 Nm
Engine Bore Size 83.4 mm 90.1 mm
Engine Stroke Size 88.9 mm 90 mm
Drive Type Rear Rear
Number of Seats 5 seats 4 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Weight 1604 kg 1574 kg
Vehicle Length 4950 mm 4660 mm
Vehicle Width 1750 mm 1860 mm
Vehicle Height 1540 mm 1340 mm
Wheelbase Size 2800 mm 2580 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 72 L 59 L