1964 Cadillac 62 vs. 2007 Chrysler Crossfire
To start off, 2007 Chrysler Crossfire is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Chrysler Crossfire (215 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 7 more horse power than 1964 Cadillac 62. (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2007 Chrysler Crossfire should accelerate faster than 1964 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 631 kg more than 2007 Chrysler Crossfire.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Cadillac 62 | 2007 Chrysler Crossfire | |
| Make | Cadillac | Chrysler |
| Model | 62 | Crossfire |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2007 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7029 cc | 3199 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 208 HP | 215 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5700 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2030 kg | 1399 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5690 mm | 4070 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1770 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1310 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2410 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 60 L |
