1964 Sunbeam Tiger vs. 2010 Ford Fusion
To start off, 2010 Ford Fusion is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Sunbeam Tiger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Sunbeam Tiger would be higher. At 4,261 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Sunbeam Tiger is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Ford Fusion weights approximately 547 kg more than 1964 Sunbeam Tiger.
Because 1964 Sunbeam Tiger is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Sunbeam Tiger. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Ford Fusion, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Sunbeam Tiger | 2010 Ford Fusion | |
Make | Sunbeam | Ford |
Model | Tiger | Fusion |
Year Released | 1964 | 2010 |
Body Type | Roadster | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4261 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 163 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1140 kg | 1687 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3970 mm | 4841 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1834 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1445 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2190 mm | 2728 mm |