1965 Bristol 409 vs. 1983 Zastava 2101

To start off, 1983 Zastava 2101 is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Bristol 409. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Bristol 409 would be higher. At 5,211 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Bristol 409 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Bristol 409 (215 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 153 more horse power than 1983 Zastava 2101. (62 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1965 Bristol 409 should accelerate faster than 1983 Zastava 2101. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Bristol 409 weights approximately 640 kg more than 1983 Zastava 2101. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1965 Bristol 409 (463 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 376 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Zastava 2101. (87 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 1965 Bristol 409 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Zastava 2101. 1965 Bristol 409 has automatic transmission and 1983 Zastava 2101 has manual transmission. 1983 Zastava 2101 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1965 Bristol 409 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: