1965 Citroen Ami vs. 2000 Skoda Octavia
To start off, 2000 Skoda Octavia is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Citroen Ami. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Citroen Ami would be higher. At 1,896 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Skoda Octavia is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Skoda Octavia (104 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 80 more horse power than 1965 Citroen Ami. (24 HP @ 4750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Skoda Octavia should accelerate faster than 1965 Citroen Ami. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Skoda Octavia weights approximately 615 kg more than 1965 Citroen Ami. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Citroen Ami | 2000 Skoda Octavia | |
Make | Citroen | Skoda |
Model | Ami | Octavia |
Year Released | 1965 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 602 cc | 1896 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | boxer | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 24 HP | 104 HP |
Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 620 kg | 1235 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3880 mm | 4510 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1530 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2520 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 25 L | 55 L |